In the Ramirez et al paper this week, we see yet another
fascinating application for the use of optogenetics in neuroscience research. I
think it was really smart to use the technique the way in which they did. It
was hard to completely understand the paradigm at first, but it was worth struggling
through it to eventually see just how cool it is. I also found the specific
technique of labeling the neurons in the hippocampus to be particularly interesting
because I had never seen this use for doxycycline before.
I often forget that memory distortion and illusions are as
common as they are because as a species we like to claim the least amount of
flaws about ourselves as possible. In reality, it is so easy to incorporate
misinformation into memory from the various sources of information all around
us. I wonder how many of my own memories are false, but I am especially curious
about those in people who have problems with irrational thinking.
It was stated in the Ramirez et al discussion section that
there hasn’t been luck thus far in locating the specific areas in which false memories
are generated in humans, but once it is I believe that better models of
treatments for PTSD could shortly follow. There will need to be a lot of
oversee and care if testing ever reaches the human level because I predict that
this technique has the potential to be very powerful, both in positive and negative
ways.
In the very last sentence of the paper, the trisynaptic
circuit is mentioned. This circuit is comprised of CA1 cells, CA3 cells, and
granule cells. Most of these experiments compared activity between CA1 and
granule cells in the DG (dentate gyrus) but CA3 cells were never looked at. I
may be missing the reason why, but I feel like they should have been examined
as well if they’re part of this circuit.
No comments:
Post a Comment