Li et all,
in my opinion, produced the most definitive argument on a topic that we have
seen so far this semester. They covered all of their bases by showing both the
behavioral and morphological effects of ketamine, as well as indicating the
major potential pathway. Unlike many common antidepressants that take chronic
use to produce effects, ketamine was shown to produce significant improvements
in the sucrose preference test and novelty suppressed feeding test immediately
after injection. The acute behavioral remedy was even shown to last seven days,
which could be very useful clinically. The morphological deficits produced by
the 21-day chronic unpredictable stress were all reversed by ketamine
injection. The synaptic protein deficiencies, spine density reduction, and
amplitude and frequency reductions of synaptic firing were all alleviated by a
single ketamine injection. After literally listing four different things that
ketamine fixes, Li et all went on to show a potential pathway for
NMDA-antagonist using rapamycin. Rapamycin is known to inhibit the mTOR
pathway, and when injected before ketamine it completely blocked the effects of
ketamine. This is the one area of the paper that I think could use some buffing
in future works. Just because we know what pathway rapamycin usually affects
and that it blocks the effects of ketamine in this experiment, I don’t think we
can definitely say that ketamine works through the mTOR pathway. I think
further testing is needed for proof of this pathway.
Pollack et
all was a lot less convincing than Li et all. There were two major things from
the Pollack paper that I particularly liked. I liked the step away from the
usual pharmacological antidepressants that we are used to seeing tested. It was
nice to see a potential clinical remedy of depression that does not need pills.
It was also interesting how it was shown that the pathway of this learned
safety is different from the pathway of typical antidepressants. The greatest
strength of this paper was how they dove into the potential circuitry and
connection behind the learned safety. Pollack proposed that the learned safety
may affect the dopaminergic neurons of the VTA, which in turn may affect the
D2R in the basolateral amygdala, Substance P mRNA, and then BDNF. It is this
kind of circuit analysis that is needed to take the next step at understanding
depression.
No comments:
Post a Comment