Although
I felt that the Adelaide et al. paper was a more difficult read, being that it
was predominantly physiology based rather than behavior based, I found that the
types of behaviors discovered to be very interesting. In regards to figure 4,
while the CREB factor was able to create a increase in fear memory, there was
no connection between the strength and the memory and the resulting anxiety
behaviors. It seems that in most of the papers we have read that these things
go hand-in-hand: better consolidation of fear, stronger fear induced behavior.
To me, I saw this as an opportunity to address the idea that memory
consolidation may be able to be separated from the fear connection as a whole.
CREB seems to solely affect the memory strength of the fear learning,
separately from the fear.
With Ramirez et al, I noticed that a few of the figures
were used in Dr. Shansky’s class, and remembered how interesting this idea was.
I particularly liked their use of the fluorescence in figure 3 when looking at
the Cfos + cells. Although not significant, it seems that there are some slight
differences, particularly in the BLA of natural recall and false recall
expression. I wonder if there is typically a disparity between the BLA and CeA
since both are usually (as seen by natural recall) “lit up” equally. After reading
the paper, I wondered about the applications of this false memory technique for
further experiments. Thinking about last weeks extinction papers, I wondered if
we could falsely create extinction in animals- perhaps comparing the idea of strong
fear conditioned animals to weak and seeing if this neuronal control of false memories
is enough to negate those effects. Furthermore, I believe this would be extra
interesting since context plays a large role in the extinction recall and this
false memory task also is demonstrated in context situations.
No comments:
Post a Comment