Both
the Tye et al and Chaudury et al articles really got me thinking about the
bigger picture of how we have developed treatments for depression and what we
might do in the future to be more effective and individualized about treatment
plans. The Tye article highlighted the idea that there are several
interconnected mechanisms at play that cause the varying symptoms of depression.
This means that it will be complicated to tease out one or two circuits with a
group of experiments, and that we then have to determine how these mechanisms
interact with or against each other in different individuals. The complexity of
these systems explains why the same antidepressants can have such varying
affects on different people and how different depression symptoms can look in
different people.
I have also wondered about the difference between acute anxiety
and stress and how this can be observed in animal models. Also, behaviorally,
humans differ greatly in their outward expression of depression and I believe
can suffer from chronic depression without suffering from acute anxiety. The
Chaudhury article alludes to this when they mention research that has been done
that shows that chronic mild stress and more severe stressors have opposite
effects on the activity of VTA dopamine neurons and produce “different changes
in levels of extracellular levels of several neurotransmitters in a number of
brain areas”.
The Chaudhury article also talks about the differences between
susceptible and resilient mice and what stimulation can cause an instant switch
between the two phenotypes. This makes me wonder about what future capabilities
we might have with humans to test for susceptibility, and in conjunction with
the type of research done in the Tyre article with complex and varying mechanisms,
what ability we might someday have to test individuals for specific mechanisms
and produce individualized and much more effective treatment.
No comments:
Post a Comment